EVALUASI KINERJA RUTTING HOT MIX ASPHALT
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##
https://doi.org/10.24843/JITS.2020.v24.i02.p01
Abstrak
One type of road damage is rutting (deformation). Rutting is a road structural damage that can interfere with traffic comfort. Rutting is an important factor to consider in asphalt mixtures. The cause of deformation is the shear strain that occurs in flexible pavement structures. In this study, the deformation behavior of flexible pavements was evaluated through simulation testing in the laboratory using the Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device (HWTD) and the Scaled Accelerated Load Simulator Device (SALSD). The correlation of the two types of simulation testing is analyzed to obtain the conversion factor (FI) value by considering the parameters of temperature, test speed, representative loading frequency and dynamic modulus of the Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) mixture. The results of this study indicate a rutting correlation between HWTD and SALSD at different temperatures. The conversion factor of HWTD to SALSD is 0.93. From the analysis, it can also be concluded that the increase in the rutting value of the HMA material causes a reduction in the effectiveness of the conversion factor between the two tests.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##
Referensi
Y. Huang. 2017. Evaluating Pavement Response and Performance with Different Simulative Tests. Doctoral Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/78294.
L.F. Walubita, S. Lee, J. Zhang, A.N. Faruk, Nguyen, ST and Scullion, T. 2013. HMA Shear Resistance, Permanent Deformation, and Rutting Tests for Texas Mixes: Year-1 Report. Technical Report 0-6744-1. Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, USA.
N. Gibson, X. Qi, A. Shenoy, G. Al-Khateeb, M.E. Kutay, A. Andriescu, K. Stuart, J. Youthcheff, T. Harman. 2012. Performance Testing for Superpave and Structural Validation.http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1224268.
S. Im. 2012. CharHMAterization of Viscoelastic and FrHMAture Properties of Asphaltic Materials in Multiple Lenght Scales. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/civilengdiss/46.
T. Gabet, H. Di Benedetto, D. Perraton, J. De Visscher, T. Gallet, W. Bańkowski, F. Olard, J. Grenfell, D. Bodin, C. Sauzéat. 2011. French Wheel TrHMAking Round Robin Test on a Polymer Modified Bitumen Mixture. RILEM TC 206-ATB, TG3: Mechanical Testing of Mixtures. Material Structure Construction 44 1031–1046. doi:10.1617/s11527-011-9733-x.
H. Wang, Z. Fan, J. Zhang. 2016. Development of a Full-Depth Wheel TrHMAking Test for Asphalt Pavement Structure: Methods and Performance Evaluation. Advance Material Science Engineering 1–8. doi:10.1155/2016/1737013.
L.F. Walubita, L. Fuentes, A. Prakoso, L.M.R. Pianeta, J.J. Komba, B. Naik. 2020. Correlating the HWTD Laboratory Test Data to Field Rutting Performance of In-Service Highway Sections. Journal Construction Building Material. 236 117552.
J.F. Rushing, D.N. Little, N. Garg. 2012. Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Used to Assess Rutting Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt Designed for High Tire Pressure Aircraft. Journal Transportation Research Board. 2296 pp. 97-105. https://doi.org/10.3141/2296-10.
Y.C. Suh, N.H. Cho. 2014. Development of a Rutting Performance Model for Asphalt Concrete Pavement Based on Test Road and HMAcelerated Pavement Test Data. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 18 pages 165–171.
J. Lee, Y.R. Kim, J. Lee. 2015. Rutting Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Mix with Different Types of Geosynthetics using MMLS3. International Journal Pavement Engineering 16 894–905. doi:10.1080/10298436.2014.972916.
S. Khan, M.N. Nagabhushana, D. Tiwari, P.K. Jain. 2013. Rutting in Flexible Pavement: An ApproHMAh of Evaluation with HMAcelerated Pavement Testing FHMAility. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 104 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.107.
P. Chaturabong, H.U. Bahia. 2017. Mechanisms of Asphalt Mixture Rutting in the Dry Hamburg Wheel TrHMAking Test and the Potential to be Alternative Test in Measuring Rutting Resistance. Construction Building Material 146 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.080.
H. Wang, H. Tan, T. Qu, J. Zhang. 2017. Effects of Test Conditions on APA Rutting and Prediction Modeling for Asphalt Mixtures. Advance Material Science Engineering 1–12. doi:10.1155/2017/2062758.
V. Radhakrishnan, G.S. Chowdari, K.S. Reddy, R. Chattaraj. 2017. Evaluation of Wheel TrHMAking and Field Rutting Susceptibility of Dense Bituminous Mixes. Road Material Pavement 1–21. doi:10.1080/14680629.2017.1374998.
G.G. Al‐Khateeb, T.S. Khedaywi, T.I.A. Obaidat, A.M. Najib. 2013. Laboratory Study for Comparing Rutting Performance of Limestone and Basalt Superpave Asphalt Mixtures. Journal Material Civil Engineering 25 21–29. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000519.
Y. Yildirim, K.H. Stokoe II. 2006. Analysis of Hamburg Wheel TrHMAking Device Results in Relation to Field Performance, FHWA/TX-06/0-4185-5. Texas Dep. Transp. 1–90.
L. F. Walubita, L. Fuentes, S. I. Lee, I. Dawd, E. Mahmoud. 2019. Comparative evaluation of five HMA rutting-related laboratory test methods relative to field performance data: DM, FN, RLPD, SPST, and HWTD. Journal Construction Building Material 215 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.250.
S. Schram, R.C. Williams. 2013. Evaluation of Bias in the Hamburg Wheel TrHMAking Device. Final Report. Iowa Dep. Transp. RB00-010.
D. General. 2012. Annual Report Directorate General of Highways, MOTC Protecting the Happiness of a Safe Journey Home.
S. Hussan, M.A. Kamal, I. Hafeez, N. Ahmad. 2017. Comparing and Correlating Various Laboratory Rutting Performance Tests. International Journal Pavement Engineering. 8436 1–12. doi:10.1080/10298436.2017.1402591.
S.H. Yang, C.W. Huang, Y.N. Sun, H.A. Susanto. 2018. The Development of the Scaled HMAcelerated Loading Simulator FHMAility and Transfer Functions to the Full-Scale Pavement Using Theory of Similitude by Finite Element Analysis. International Journal Pavement Research and Technology. S1996-6814 1–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijprt.2018.03.004.
M. Buncher, M. Anderson. 2014. MS-2 7 th Edition Asphalt Mix Design Methods.
M. Losa, A.D. Natale. 2012. Evaluation of Representative Loading Frequency for Linear Elastic Analysis of Asphalt Pavements. Journal Transportation Research Board. 2305 150–161. doi:10.3141/2305-16.
K. Mollenhauer, M. Wistuba, R. Rabe. 2009. Loading Frequency and Fatigue; In Situ Conditioins & Impact on HMA Test Results, 2nd Work. Four Point Bending, Pais. ISBN 978-9 261–276.
L.N. Mohammad, M.A. Elseif, S.B. Cooper III, C.S. Hughes, J.W. Button, E.L. Dukatz Jr. 2016. Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete. doi:10.17226/23475.
L.F. Walubita, S. Lee, J. Zhang, A.N. Faruk, Nguyen, ST and Scullion, T. 2013. HMA Shear Resistance, Permanent Deformation, and Rutting Tests for Texas Mixes: Year-1 Report. Technical Report 0-6744-1. Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, USA.
N. Gibson, X. Qi, A. Shenoy, G. Al-Khateeb, M.E. Kutay, A. Andriescu, K. Stuart, J. Youthcheff, T. Harman. 2012. Performance Testing for Superpave and Structural Validation.http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1224268.
S. Im. 2012. CharHMAterization of Viscoelastic and FrHMAture Properties of Asphaltic Materials in Multiple Lenght Scales. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/civilengdiss/46.
T. Gabet, H. Di Benedetto, D. Perraton, J. De Visscher, T. Gallet, W. Bańkowski, F. Olard, J. Grenfell, D. Bodin, C. Sauzéat. 2011. French Wheel TrHMAking Round Robin Test on a Polymer Modified Bitumen Mixture. RILEM TC 206-ATB, TG3: Mechanical Testing of Mixtures. Material Structure Construction 44 1031–1046. doi:10.1617/s11527-011-9733-x.
H. Wang, Z. Fan, J. Zhang. 2016. Development of a Full-Depth Wheel TrHMAking Test for Asphalt Pavement Structure: Methods and Performance Evaluation. Advance Material Science Engineering 1–8. doi:10.1155/2016/1737013.
L.F. Walubita, L. Fuentes, A. Prakoso, L.M.R. Pianeta, J.J. Komba, B. Naik. 2020. Correlating the HWTD Laboratory Test Data to Field Rutting Performance of In-Service Highway Sections. Journal Construction Building Material. 236 117552.
J.F. Rushing, D.N. Little, N. Garg. 2012. Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Used to Assess Rutting Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt Designed for High Tire Pressure Aircraft. Journal Transportation Research Board. 2296 pp. 97-105. https://doi.org/10.3141/2296-10.
Y.C. Suh, N.H. Cho. 2014. Development of a Rutting Performance Model for Asphalt Concrete Pavement Based on Test Road and HMAcelerated Pavement Test Data. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 18 pages 165–171.
J. Lee, Y.R. Kim, J. Lee. 2015. Rutting Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Mix with Different Types of Geosynthetics using MMLS3. International Journal Pavement Engineering 16 894–905. doi:10.1080/10298436.2014.972916.
S. Khan, M.N. Nagabhushana, D. Tiwari, P.K. Jain. 2013. Rutting in Flexible Pavement: An ApproHMAh of Evaluation with HMAcelerated Pavement Testing FHMAility. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 104 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.107.
P. Chaturabong, H.U. Bahia. 2017. Mechanisms of Asphalt Mixture Rutting in the Dry Hamburg Wheel TrHMAking Test and the Potential to be Alternative Test in Measuring Rutting Resistance. Construction Building Material 146 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.080.
H. Wang, H. Tan, T. Qu, J. Zhang. 2017. Effects of Test Conditions on APA Rutting and Prediction Modeling for Asphalt Mixtures. Advance Material Science Engineering 1–12. doi:10.1155/2017/2062758.
V. Radhakrishnan, G.S. Chowdari, K.S. Reddy, R. Chattaraj. 2017. Evaluation of Wheel TrHMAking and Field Rutting Susceptibility of Dense Bituminous Mixes. Road Material Pavement 1–21. doi:10.1080/14680629.2017.1374998.
G.G. Al‐Khateeb, T.S. Khedaywi, T.I.A. Obaidat, A.M. Najib. 2013. Laboratory Study for Comparing Rutting Performance of Limestone and Basalt Superpave Asphalt Mixtures. Journal Material Civil Engineering 25 21–29. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000519.
Y. Yildirim, K.H. Stokoe II. 2006. Analysis of Hamburg Wheel TrHMAking Device Results in Relation to Field Performance, FHWA/TX-06/0-4185-5. Texas Dep. Transp. 1–90.
L. F. Walubita, L. Fuentes, S. I. Lee, I. Dawd, E. Mahmoud. 2019. Comparative evaluation of five HMA rutting-related laboratory test methods relative to field performance data: DM, FN, RLPD, SPST, and HWTD. Journal Construction Building Material 215 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.250.
S. Schram, R.C. Williams. 2013. Evaluation of Bias in the Hamburg Wheel TrHMAking Device. Final Report. Iowa Dep. Transp. RB00-010.
D. General. 2012. Annual Report Directorate General of Highways, MOTC Protecting the Happiness of a Safe Journey Home.
S. Hussan, M.A. Kamal, I. Hafeez, N. Ahmad. 2017. Comparing and Correlating Various Laboratory Rutting Performance Tests. International Journal Pavement Engineering. 8436 1–12. doi:10.1080/10298436.2017.1402591.
S.H. Yang, C.W. Huang, Y.N. Sun, H.A. Susanto. 2018. The Development of the Scaled HMAcelerated Loading Simulator FHMAility and Transfer Functions to the Full-Scale Pavement Using Theory of Similitude by Finite Element Analysis. International Journal Pavement Research and Technology. S1996-6814 1–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijprt.2018.03.004.
M. Buncher, M. Anderson. 2014. MS-2 7 th Edition Asphalt Mix Design Methods.
M. Losa, A.D. Natale. 2012. Evaluation of Representative Loading Frequency for Linear Elastic Analysis of Asphalt Pavements. Journal Transportation Research Board. 2305 150–161. doi:10.3141/2305-16.
K. Mollenhauer, M. Wistuba, R. Rabe. 2009. Loading Frequency and Fatigue; In Situ Conditioins & Impact on HMA Test Results, 2nd Work. Four Point Bending, Pais. ISBN 978-9 261–276.
L.N. Mohammad, M.A. Elseif, S.B. Cooper III, C.S. Hughes, J.W. Button, E.L. Dukatz Jr. 2016. Comparing the Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of Laboratory and Field Specimens of Asphalt Concrete. doi:10.17226/23475.
Diterbitkan
2021-03-31
##submission.howToCite##
SUSANTO, Hery Awan; PAMUDJI, Gandjar; MULYONO, Bagyo.
EVALUASI KINERJA RUTTING HOT MIX ASPHALT.
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, [S.l.], p. 90-100, mar. 2021.
ISSN 2541-5484.
Tersedia pada: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id./index.php/jits/article/view/65343>. Tanggal Akses: 20 apr. 2025
doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/JITS.2020.v24.i02.p01.
Bagian
Articles
